The State of our Party, the LibDems

When I started this blog I had great support from a fellow LibDem supporter who had similar views to myself. He wrote a blog too, much better than this one. We wanted two questions on the referendum paper as we felt that was the only way forward for Home Rule, an ideal our party had be striving for, for over 100 years. We also felt the party has lost its way in the search for power. Yesterday he had a shock for all who followed his blog, he was giving it up. He also mentioned that he had thought about sending his membership card back, This is how bad things have got in the party.

The Royal Kingdoms of Orkney, Shetland & Fife

It seems as if some patriotic Scots think that if Scotland becomes independent that certain areas should have the right to cede from Scotland. You have to wonder if these Scots have thought this out and if they have asked  the people of these area what they think? In days gone by they would of been charged with treason but we are too civilised now to go that far. We just think that it is a few politicians who dislike of the SNP and what they stand and this gets in their way of rational thought and not what is best for the constituencies they represent & those Earls & Lords whose only claim to represent us is who his great great great ..... great grandfather was and who that relative killed to gain the land & title.

Post Conferences & The Real World

You may of noticed my absence on both here & Twitter. That is due to me being busy but also wanting to have a bit of a relaxing time. The busy part was attending two conferences/meetings. They could not of been more different, the Scot LibDem Conference in Inverness & the HMDSN Hirschsprung's meeting in Glasgow.

Independence, Why

I watched last night's Scotland Tonight and one of the contributors was the editor of a Irish newspaper. In a discussion he had with a constitutional expert, the difference between our debate and say Ireland's & India's was that the economy did not come into it. I was not around when their independence happened so I have to take their word for it. Why does it seem so important in our discussions?

In You We trust

One of the things that initially drove me away from the LibDem party was a loss of faith in it. Where had its soul gone? In the 2010 general election I was going to vote SNP as I wanted a voice for Scotland in Westminster. I could not hear it from the Tory's or Labour & definitely not from our party, the LibDem's. Calman was the only option on offer. So far as I was concerned the LibDem's no longer spoke for Scotland.

I then met the local MP, John Thurso and he persuaded me to vote LibDem. I was excited that we would have a strong voice in Westminster, there was an outside change of leading the government. Yes, maybe a dream but for someone who had been voting LibDem for decades one I longed for.

Scottish LibDem Membership Increases by One

It may not be big news that the membership of Scottish LibDem's has increased by one but it is to me, I am the one who joined. Isn't strange that a supporter of Independence joins a party that is against it? Let me explain.

I first became interested in nationalism when I was at college in 1968 when I spoke in favour on Independence. I spoke in favour not out of any strong conviction but there was no one else willing to speak in favour. That debate ignited a life long debate within me Independence or Home Rule, SNP or Scottish Liberals (no Lib Dem in those days). One thing I learnt then was that what was on offer by the Union was not to Scotland's advantage. I was living in Aberdeen at the start on North sea oil and I saw how Aberdeen & the surrounding was changing. My friend working in the advertising sales of the Press & Journal and he was very busy with companies moving in to the area. 

I left Aberdeen & my parents home in Glenlivet in 1973 to find fame & fortune in London or at least a job. I could see how Scotland was ignored and little understood in the south. Living in London and laterly Milton Keynes but working in London, I voted Liberal & LibDem. The LibDem party has always matched more closely my own personal views. I want to see fairness in society, where the individual is important and that they should be free to act as they want to for the benefit of the all. I was born in Sunderland in the NE of England and again I could see how that area was also ignored by a centralised government. I love the NE of England & especially Sunderland. All of my life I have supported Sunderland AFC which has not been easy. How would independence for Scotland help that area? Would a federal system for the UK as a whole and more control for the English regions help both them & Scotland? 

These are questions that most UK parties have not answer. The LibDem's want a federal system to give powers to the English regions and Scotland. the problem is this has never been properly defined. The party has never really been near power to try to implement this policy. As time went on the federal option seems to of been forgotten until we have reached the current state of saying, yes we want more powers for Scotland but can't tell you what these are. We need to have another commission. 

Since the Scottish parliament was formed we have had the Steel Commission & then the Calman Commission and yet after these we need another commission. We have been advocating Home Rule since the 19th century but still have no real policy on it. The common response is that Home Rule is an evolving thing but there has been no answer given to what will it evolve into. Without knowing what you want to achieve, how can you set your path?

We have reached a truly defining point in the history of Scotland, the chance of having a properly independent country again in within sight for the first time in centuries. For this reasons we need to get it right. Why have we come to this point? Well there is no doubt, it is the SNP and how they have galvanised the population of Scotland who want more power for Scotland. They have shown that Scotland has the ability and confidence to be able to govern itself. The debate in Scotland is now how much power  do the Scottish people want. This is where the Scot LibDem's should be able to come into their own but we can't. Why?

Well firstly as I said before we have no current policy on what powers Scotland should have. Within the UK we are part of a government whose main party has always been against giving powers to Scotland. Therefore we see the likes of Michael Moore never mentioning a federal UK, who voices opinions that this debate is harming Scotland but offers no proof. The country has been lied to before by Westminster, The McCrone Report. The UK LibDem party is viewed as the party who does not want to give more powers to Scotland and refuses to believe that Scotland can be independent despite the facts.

The first chink in the united LibDem front appeared today in the Sunday Herald  Willie Rennie said that the current Union is "out-dated and over centralised". That is a big step to make but what he has not said is how he will achieve this. If we have a single question referendum and the answer is no, how will the federal system be brought in? Does anyone believe that any party will bring it in? No, they won't. we have only achieved this parliament because of the strength of the SNP and the fear by Westminster that Scotland will become independent.

If the LibDem's follow this current path we will be seen as a party thwarting the will of the Scottish people by having no second option, currently the favoured option. Most of the debates we have seem to be between 2 or 3 parties Cons. Labour and if in Scotland SNP. The LibDem's are lumped in with the Government i.e. the Tory's. We have no independent voice in these debates.

Why is the party so afraid of putting Home Rule on the ballot paper the option that they have been putting forward since the 19th century. Of joining with the civic groups to support it? If the Scottish people voted in favour of it then would not this long held dream become reality? What other way could this be achieved? 

Coming back to why did I join the party. It is a party I love, I think it is following the wrong path and I want to try to change that path. Do I have the right to ask for these changes if I am not a member? Would the party listen to me if I were not? Maybe No to both questions but for me I would not feel I had the right to ask and be on the outside.

If the Home Rule question was on the ballot paper how would I vote? Without seeing exactly what is on offer I can't say. I am uncertain, I think that the odds are it would be for independence. It is obvious how I would vote if it was not on the paper, Yes for a Scotland that can control its own destiny and have the powers to build a society that us Scots believe in. Retaining the NHS, making sure that schools are run for the benefit of all and not for the few. Where we have a safety net for the sick and dying and that they do not have to worry about having their benefits taken off them. Yes maybe a dream but if we fail it will be us to blame but we would of had the powers to make it happen.

Why does the SNP own Independence?

I was talking to some folk on twitter last night and it helped to sort my problem of why I was voting SNP. For as long as I remember I wanted Independence for Scotland. I even stood for it in a debate in college in 1968. I lost the debate, Nationalism was not very popular in those days, especially in Aberdeen.

I have never been a great supporter of the SNP except for one policy, Independence. I am much more at home with the Liberals and then grudging the Liberal Democrats. That was until May 2010 when my trust was shattered and remains so. On twitter last night, amongst others, I meet a guy called Andrew and he writes a great blog http://scottish-liberal.blogspot.com/ I thought your views are similar to mine but you stayed in the LibDem party. How many others are there from all parties who want independence who have stayed in their parties or like me who have left and voted SNP but whose's heart is not really in that party. Not as because they are voting as a protest vote but because they want Independence and see no other way of obtaining it.

The Case for the Union, shouting?

The unionist parties have started their defense of the union. Danny Alexander & Micheal Moore, both Scottish LibDem MP's have made speeches this week on the value of the Union.


I have not been able to read their speeches in full and so have had to relay on newspaper reports. From these, it seems as if the same old arguments are being trotted out. Is it the correct way to defend the union, by attack independence and Scotland's ability to be an independent nation? As the Guardian today put it "Alexander said it would have been "catastrophic" for Scotland to deal with a collapsing banking sector had it not been part of the UK and said that if it had stood alone "Scotland's deficit would have been one of the largest in Europe"."

why scotlands neds arent rioting

How should we describe these riots as UK or England's riots? Also was it wrong for the First Minister to point out that the riots were only happening in England and not the rest of the UK?

This came to a head when several English journalist recommended on Twitter that we read a blog about the question why scotlands neds arent rioting This blog is written by a scotsman living in London, actually a Westminster correspondent. I have become aware of how some Scots who head south in the media become very 'British' and start viewing Scotland & the Scots from a different view point as resident Scots do. It is also obvious that Tourcil (the blogger) is not a SNP supporter. So how much of his dislike of the First Minister affected his views.